rundash vs Multica: agents for marketing, not a workflow IDE.
Short answer: Multica is a full workflow IDE for technical teams. rundash is for marketers who want agents running recurring work on a schedule — no graph-building required. Most teams end up using both when engineering wants deep customization and marketing wants the weekly report to just happen.
Multica is aimed at technical users who want to build and fork workflow graphs — bring your own model keys, orchestrate multi-step flows with custom nodes. rundash is a hosted SaaS aimed at founders and marketers who don't want to think about infrastructure; we ship a board, schedules, a review queue, and 1,000+ integrations for SaaS tools (Stripe, HubSpot, Notion, Search Console, the works). The categorical split is "do you want to build the graph, or describe the job?"
How to choose
Most teams end up using both.
Choose Multica if:
- You need deep custom-node extensibility
- You want to fork the framework and customize it
- Your team is engineering-led and wants to own the graph
Choose rundash if:
- The work you want automated is not code
- You want something hosted, not something to deploy
- You want Stripe / HubSpot / Notion / Search Console integrations out of the box
Use both if:
- Multica runs engineering flows; rundash runs the ops layer around them (release notes, support triage, churn saves)
- Technical team uses Multica on custom pipelines; marketing uses rundash on the funnel
Still not sure?
Build one agent on Free and see. 10 runs/month, no card, every integration.